From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 29 Jun 2001 10:55:51 -0700
Mark Kettenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The way the ext2fs and ufs file system calculate the number of
> available blocks can yield a negative number. Since fsblkcont_t is an
> unsigned type th
Mark Kettenis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The way the ext2fs and ufs file system calculate the number of
> available blocks can yield a negative number. Since fsblkcont_t is an
> unsigned type this causes some interesting output from df, when your
> filesystem is clogging up.
Hrm. Before chec
The way the ext2fs and ufs file system calculate the number of
available blocks can yield a negative number. Since fsblkcont_t is an
unsigned type this causes some interesting output from df, when your
filesystem is clogging up.
Roland, OK to check thus in?
Mark
Index: ext2fs/ChangeLog
from
