Hello,
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 7:46 PM, wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:07:37AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
>
>> > The real problem is organisational: changing an existing interface
>> > is a very fundamental decision, and the current maintainer s
Hi,
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:07:37AM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
> > The real problem is organisational: changing an existing interface
> > is a very fundamental decision, and the current maintainer situation
> > regarding the Hurd means that there is
Hello,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 9:13 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 10:45:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:46:40AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> > > writes:
>
>> > > > So the ide
Hello,
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 8:35 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:18:59PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
>> antrik told me to try to step into the dir_lookup call, but gdb does
>> not want to comply with my desires... I installed hurd-dbg package (as
>> antrik had recommended), but it d
Hi,
On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 10:45:15PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:46:40AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > > writes:
> > > > So the idea is to have only the first instance do a full
> > >
Hi,
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:18:59PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> antrik told me to try to step into the dir_lookup call, but gdb does
> not want to comply with my desires... I installed hurd-dbg package (as
> antrik had recommended), but it didn't help.
Eh, right... You obviously need libc0.
Hello,
I'm very much sorry for the big gap in my activity: I had to devote a
large amount of time to a course project...
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Sergiu Ivanov
wrote:
>> However, now that you mention it, I seriously wonder whether this isn't
>> really what we should do. As reopening with
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 06:46:40AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > writes:
> > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > >> writes:
> > >> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Serg
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 04:29:40PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> writes:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> >> writes:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > So the idea is to have only the first instance do a full transla
Hello,
writes:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> writes:
>> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>
>> > I said running multiple translator instances in one process, not
>> > sharing one translator instance among clients... That's quit
Hi,
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:37:55PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> > I said running multiple translator instances in one process, not
> > sharing one translator instance among clients... That's quite a
> > different t
writes:
> On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:01 PM, wrote:
>
>> > As I already pointed out, sooner or later we will problably need
>> > some framework to conflate simimlar translator instances in a single
>> > process -- while dynamic tra
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 08:56:50PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:01 PM, wrote:
> > As I already pointed out, sooner or later we will problably need
> > some framework to conflate simimlar translator instances in a single
> > process -- while dynamic translators ar
Hello,
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:01 PM, wrote:
> As I already pointed out, sooner or later we will problably need some
> framework to conflate simimlar translator instances in a single process
> -- while dynamic translators are likely to make the problem evident in
> many cases, the problem its
14 matches
Mail list logo
