Hello,
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 08:37:41AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2009 17:29:01 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
>
> > > It's hard to do that, though, if the discussion is a prerequisite to
> > > beginning at all. I hope the suggestion for the wiki helps reducing
> >
Hi Scolobb,
I at last get to answering this mail :)
Am Mittwoch, 16. September 2009 17:29:01 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > It's hard to do that, though, if the discussion is a prerequisite to
> > beginning at all. I hope the suggestion for the wiki helps reducing
> > the number of stopping points
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 10:33:36PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 13. September 2009 17:41:36 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
>
> > My strategy is to try to fix some decisions which tend to appear in
> > the flow of discussion and include them in some (temporary) roadmap.
> > Thu
Hi,
Am Sonntag, 13. September 2009 17:41:36 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > It's a trap into which groups often seem to fall (in my experience).
>
> I've encountered this problem several times myself; it is one of those
> which make themselves known only after one has fallen into it.
Jupp. But I thi
Hello,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 09:49:11AM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 8. September 2009 23:40:24 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> > > Also I assume that in the time we already spent on discussing where to
> > > put the information, we could already have written and then reworked a
