Hi,
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:37:59PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> - Implement a queue in libdiskfs to deal with m_o_data_return
> requests and a static amount of consumers which will do the real
> work. Each time the kernel sends us a m_o_data_return, we just add
> the request to the qu
El Fri, 9 Apr 2010 12:09:24 +0200
Thomas Schwinge escribió:
> Hello!
>
> Sergio, great to see you're back!
>
Thanks!
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:37:59PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > To my knowledge, [...]
>
> I can't comment on your assumptions, however:
>
> > So I'm thinking about the
Hello!
Sergio, great to see you're back!
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 12:37:59PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> To my knowledge, [...]
I can't comment on your assumptions, however:
> So I'm thinking about the following changes:
>
> - Implement a queue in libdiskfs to deal with m_o_data_return
>
Hi all,
Since it has been proved that throttling thread creation is not the
solution (not even a proper workaround) to prevent thread storms, I'd
like to discuss some strategies to deal with them.
To my knowledge, thread storms are usually caused by GNU Mach
continuously sending m_o_data_return r
