rd@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Automated releases
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:15:13AM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
Aren't all the automated tools for that already made? Couldn't we just
use britney with our own settings?
Yes of course. But it still requires someone to set it up, adapt it to
our
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 02:15:13AM +0100, Pierre THIERRY wrote:
> Aren't all the automated tools for that already made? Couldn't we just
> use britney with our own settings?
Yes of course. But it still requires someone to set it up, adapt it to
our archives, etc. Also, it's not always smart
Pierre THIERRY, le Wed 19 Mar 2008 02:15:13 +0100, a écrit :
> Scribit [EMAIL PROTECTED] dies 18/03/2008 hora 16:03:
> > As Michael pointed out, that would be pretty useful, but probably
> > quite some work.
>
> Aren't all the automated tools for that already made? Couldn't we just
> use britney w
Scribit [EMAIL PROTECTED] dies 18/03/2008 hora 16:03:
> As Michael pointed out, that would be pretty useful, but probably
> quite some work.
Aren't all the automated tools for that already made? Couldn't we just
use britney with our own settings?
Curiously,
Pierre
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP 0x
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:34:42PM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> On 17/03/2008, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The problem is that there is no easy automatic process: missing
> > dependencies have to be found in the archive, etc.
> >
> What kind of archive? Shouldn't Debian
