Hi,
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 04:50:56PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:48:34AM +0200, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net
> wrote:
> What would have been a more appropriate problem to describe, would
> have been that if equality test were to be done in the sender (or the
> rece
ying to think about all possible
> implications up front. Same reason I was always sceptical about the
> ngHurd stuff...
I agree with your critique. I'm planning to refocus my effort, but
perhaps not in the way you'd want ;-). However, this will be the
topic of another mail.
I
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 02:46:10PM +0200, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote:
> I guess this mail turned out to be more of a report on my findings
> rather than to start a discussion. So I'm mostly looking for
> feedback, e.g. if what I'm saying doesn't make sense, if one of my
> assumptions are wron
mail about
what I like to call ``authority verification''.
Though I am open to suggestions for alternatives to the name. ;-)
Most objects in the Hurd depend on other objects to function. In order
for a process to receive a mobile object from a sending process it must
gain access to
