Re: [Patch #306] idvec_merge_implied_gids does not merge in secondary IDs

2002-05-11 Thread Neal H. Walfield
> Maybe. It can be very noisy if people just diddle things around, like > change the category back and forth or reassign the reports. I am not sure > what the update messages look like (I wish the patch mails would contain the > patch!), so we should probably just try it out. Agreed. However,

Re: [Patch #306] idvec_merge_implied_gids does not merge in secondary IDs

2002-05-11 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 08:50:53PM -0400, Neal H. Walfield wrote: > > I have not enabled that notifications are sent for each update to each patch > > or support request. > > I think that it would actually be a good idea to enable this feature. Maybe. It can be very noisy if people just diddle

Re: [Patch #306] idvec_merge_implied_gids does not merge in secondary IDs

2002-05-11 Thread Neal H. Walfield
> I have not enabled that notifications are sent for each update to each patch > or support request. I think that it would actually be a good idea to enable this feature. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/

Re: [Patch #306] idvec_merge_implied_gids does not merge in secondary IDs

2002-05-11 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
Hi, so this is how it looks if somebody submits a patch to the Savannah project. I have set it up so that it sends one such notification for each patch to this list, and for each support request one similar notification to help-hurd. I have not enabled that notifications are sent for each updat

[Patch #306] idvec_merge_implied_gids does not merge in secondary IDs

2002-05-11 Thread nobody
Patch #306 has been updated. Project: Category: libshouldbeinlibc Status: Open Summary: idvec_merge_implied_gids does not merge in secondary IDs --- For more info, visit: http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=306&group_id=