On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:24:55PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:31:46 +0200, Jonathan Neuschäfer
> wrote:
> > In reply to this mail, I'll send some patches. (They are untested)
>
> Thanks anyway! ;-) (But of course, we prefer tested patches.)
>
>
> > I also
Thomas Schwinge, le Wed 07 Sep 2011 17:24:55 +0200, a écrit :
> I supposed this would be things like unlocking acquired
> locks on *all* function exit paths, etc.?
Yes. I talked about it with Julia some time ago, she told me it should
be feasible. We just need someone to work on it :) (Julia hers
Hi!
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 14:31:46 +0200, Jonathan Neuschäfer
wrote:
> In reply to this mail, I'll send some patches. (They are untested)
Thanks anyway! ;-) (But of course, we prefer tested patches.)
> I also planned to send a coccinelle-generated patch, but I didn't review
> it, so it would b
Hello,
Jonathan Neuschäfer, le Mon 15 Aug 2011 14:31:46 +0200, a écrit :
> In reply to this mail, I'll send some patches. (They are untested)
Thanks! Please also post Change Logs for them, see the GNU Coding
Standards and existing entries in git log for example. For the spelling
patch, just sayin
Hello.
In reply to this mail, I'll send some patches. (They are untested)
I also planned to send a coccinelle-generated patch, but I didn't review
it, so it would be a bit pointless. Anyway, this is the coccinelle patch:
@@ expression *p; @@
- p = 0
+ p = NULL
Thanks,
Jonathan Neuschäf
