Hi Sergey,
On 16/7/23 21:29, Sergey Bugaev wrote:
> I'd be happy to share more details about the grand plan if you're
> interested — and actually it'd be great to discuss this with you since
> I don't know much about device drivers etc. and you might point out
> some important shortcomings in my p
Damien Zammit, le dim. 16 juil. 2023 10:38:31 +, a ecrit:
> This standardises the format of the boot parameters so that
> they all use the same parameter --next-task to specify the next
> task in the boot order. It does assume the next task is always exec,
> however. This may not be a problem
Isn't it possible to achieve this goal with an initramfs ?
Le dim. 16 juil. 2023, 13:30, Sergey Bugaev a écrit :
> Hi Damien,
>
> On Sun, Jul 16, 2023, 13:39 Damien Zammit wrote:
> > This standardises the format of the boot parameters so that
> > they all use the same parameter --next-task to s
Hi Damien,
On Sun, Jul 16, 2023, 13:39 Damien Zammit wrote:
> This standardises the format of the boot parameters so that
> they all use the same parameter --next-task to specify the next
> task in the boot order.
I mentioned this in some other thread, repeating now: I have this
grand plan for r
This standardises the format of the boot parameters so that
they all use the same parameter --next-task to specify the next
task in the boot order. It does assume the next task is always exec,
however. This may not be a problem.
---
libdiskfs/opts-std-startup.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 inse
