Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-28 12:34:43)
> Justus Winter, le Mon 28 Apr 2014 12:20:00 +0200, a écrit :
> > Previously, inum was of type int, whereas dino_ref expects ino_t. On
> > Hurd/x86 the former is 32 bit wide, the latter 64. If dino_ref is
> > inlined, this does not seem to pose a prob
Justus Winter, le Mon 28 Apr 2014 12:20:00 +0200, a écrit :
> Previously, inum was of type int, whereas dino_ref expects ino_t. On
> Hurd/x86 the former is 32 bit wide, the latter 64. If dino_ref is
> inlined, this does not seem to pose a problem, but if ext2fs is
> compiled with -O0, this most l
Previously, inum was of type int, whereas dino_ref expects ino_t. On
Hurd/x86 the former is 32 bit wide, the latter 64. If dino_ref is
inlined, this does not seem to pose a problem, but if ext2fs is
compiled with -O0, this most likely results in an invalid memory access.
* ext2fs/ialloc.c (ext2_
