Justus Winter, le Mon 02 Dec 2013 14:10:56 +0100, a écrit :
> Quoting Marin Ramesa (2013-12-02 11:55:14)
> > On 02.12.2013 10:37:08, Justus Winter wrote:
> > > The other day you were fixing this kind of code, now you're
> > > introducing it. Maybe there's a better way to silence this warning,
> > >
Quoting Marin Ramesa (2013-12-02 11:55:14)
> On 02.12.2013 10:37:08, Justus Winter wrote:
> > The other day you were fixing this kind of code, now you're
> > introducing it. Maybe there's a better way to silence this warning,
> > maybe some attribute.
>
> Maybe initialize to some kind of a templat
On 02.12.2013 11:55:14, Marin Ramesa wrote:
> +for (counter = 0; i < N_NET_HASH_KEYS; i++)
This should be:
for (counter = 0; counter < N_NET_HASH_KEYS; counter++);
On 02.12.2013 10:37:08, Justus Winter wrote:
> The other day you were fixing this kind of code, now you're
> introducing it. Maybe there's a better way to silence this warning,
> maybe some attribute.
Maybe initialize to some kind of a template, like this:
From 0b850181995519071d3064c45dbbc31b762
Quoting Marin Ramesa (2013-12-02 09:14:35)
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > It doesn't seem so clear that it's actually always properly initialized.
> > We also need a comment explaining why it always is.
>
> * device/net_io.c (hash_entp): Initialize and add a comment saying why this
> was done.
>
>
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> It doesn't seem so clear that it's actually always properly initialized.
> We also need a comment explaining why it always is.
* device/net_io.c (hash_entp): Initialize and add a comment saying why this was
done.
---
device/net_io.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insert
