Re: [PATCH 0/3 gnumach] percpu with gs

2023-09-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le dim. 24 sept. 2023 10:33:39 +0200, a ecrit: > Damien Zammit, le dim. 24 sept. 2023 05:28:34 +, a ecrit: > > I did not include inlining of the cpu_number calls because > > I noticed there was some bug introduced when I did this. > > That really deserves fixing first, because

Re: [PATCH 0/3 gnumach] percpu with gs

2023-09-24 Thread Samuel Thibault
Damien Zammit, le dim. 24 sept. 2023 05:28:34 +, a ecrit: > I did not include inlining of the cpu_number calls because > I noticed there was some bug introduced when I did this. That really deserves fixing first, because it means that somehow it's not expressed correctly, i.e. percpu_get is no

[PATCH 0/3 gnumach] percpu with gs

2023-09-23 Thread Damien Zammit
Hi, I have split out the unrelated parts as suggested. I did not include inlining of the cpu_number calls because I noticed there was some bug introduced when I did this. I have tested both uniprocessor and smp as described in the commit message of patch 2, which I repeated for all 3 patches. T