Justus Winter, le Mon 05 Aug 2013 12:11:30 +0200, a écrit :
> This makes killall5 actually kill any processes not marked as
> important.
Applied, thanks!
Samuel
Richard Braun, le Thu 29 Aug 2013 12:23:54 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:05:30PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
> > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-29 00:24:59)
> > > Mmm, I'm not sure whether we really want to introduce
> > > proc_set_code/proc_get_code just for killall5. We could j
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:05:30PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote:
> Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-29 00:24:59)
> > Mmm, I'm not sure whether we really want to introduce
> > proc_set_code/proc_get_code just for killall5. We could just put
> > 0x0800 / 0x0900 values for non-essential process
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-29 00:24:59)
> Justus Winter, le Mon 05 Aug 2013 12:11:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > + if (essential)
> > + start_code = end_code = 0; /* To make killall5.c consider it a
> > + kernel process that is to be
> > +
Justus Winter, le Mon 05 Aug 2013 12:11:30 +0200, a écrit :
> + if (essential)
> + start_code = end_code = 0; /* To make killall5.c consider it a
> + kernel process that is to be
> + left alone. */
> + else
> + p
This makes killall5 actually kill any processes not marked as
important.
* process.c (process_file_gc_stat): Fix {start,end}_code.
---
process.c | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/process.c b/process.c
index c5ef7d8..269a18b 100644
--- a
