---
lwip/Makefile | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lwip/Makefile b/lwip/Makefile
index c5f3c8cb..d0ddfd38 100644
--- a/lwip/Makefile
+++ b/lwip/Makefile
@@ -47,4 +47,3 @@ iioctl-MIGSFLAGS = -imacros $(srcdir)/mig-mutate.h
# cpp doesn't automatically make dependencies for -imac
Hi,
2017-12-19 19:21 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> Is it not actually valid for posix systems in general? (except the
> cond_wait thing which I patched over)
That's what the port/ folder contains:
- lwipopts.h is for configuring the stack parameters
- cc.h is for integrating the stack in our
On Tue, 2017-12-19 at 19:21 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Joan Lledó, on mar. 19 déc. 2017 19:11:40 +0100, wrote:
> > - The patches in debian/patches are not enough to make the server
> > work, for instance, we're calling lwip_poll() which is not in 2.0.3
> > nor any patch in the package.
I tho
Joan Lledó, on mar. 19 déc. 2017 19:11:40 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 20:03 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > I am talking about the files you created in your repository, they are
> > hold a GPL copyright notice. I guess at some point we will want to see
> > them maintained within lwip, and thus BSD-
Hi Samuel,
2017-12-18 20:03 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> I am talking about the files you created in your repository, they are
> hold a GPL copyright notice. I guess at some point we will want to see
> them maintained within lwip, and thus BSD-licensed.
>
I've been reviewing the reposotory you
Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 19:27:30 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 17:28 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > BTW, your lwip code should probably be made BSD-licensed, just like the
> > rest of lwip.
>
> Mmm, I think I don't know what you mean, if I send patches to a
> BSD-licensed project, they are
2017-12-18 17:28 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> BTW, your lwip code should probably be made BSD-licensed, just like the
> rest of lwip.
Mmm, I think I don't know what you mean, if I send patches to a
BSD-licensed project, they are BSD too, right?
On 18 Dec 2017, at 17:09, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> James Clarke, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:06:28 +, wrote:
>> On 18 Dec 2017, at 16:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> We need to know what
James Clarke, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:06:28 +, wrote:
> On 18 Dec 2017, at 16:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
> >> 2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> >>> We need to know what is not yet in upstream, what will
> >>> eventually g
On 18 Dec 2017, at 16:28, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
>> 2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
>>> We need to know what is not yet in upstream, what will
>>> eventually get to upstream, and what may not get to
>>> upstream.
>>
>> There'r
Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 17:10:42 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > We need to know what is not yet in upstream, what will
> > eventually get to upstream, and what may not get to
> > upstream.
>
> There're also some patches that are in upstream, I think it wo
2017-12-18 14:46 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> Ok, but I don't see that base in your repository, the first commit
> already has a lot of source code which is not in 2.0.1.
Oh, yes. That's because I first imported all lwip 2.0.1 code to my
lwip-hurd repository and made many changes there. Then I mo
Hello,
Joan Lledó, on lun. 18 déc. 2017 12:58:35 +0100, wrote:
> 2017-12-18 2:32 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> > Or are you actually based on another lwip?
>
> Yes, It's based in the version 2.0.1, as I started to work on this
> back in February.
Ok, but I don't see that base in your repository,
Hello,
2017-12-18 2:32 GMT+01:00 Samuel Thibault :
> Or are you actually based on another lwip?
Yes, It's based in the version 2.0.1, as I started to work on this
back in February. I plan to upgrade liblwip to the last version in a
few months.
Hello,
I'm however having a hard time matching your
g...@github.com:jlledom/liblwip-hurd.git repository with the upstream
https://git.savannah.nongnu.org/git/lwip.git repository. Since the plan
is to just pick up upstream as much as possible, we need to keep the
delta small.
Or are you actually b
Hello,
At last, found the time to commit this :)
Huge hanks!
Samuel
Joan Lledó, on lun. 13 nov. 2017 08:31:45 +0100, wrote:
> After working on the perl tests fails, I can say they are due to bugs in
> lwip, not in our server. I've already sent the bug reports.
Heh, nice :D
Samuel
---
Makefile | 4 +
config.make.in | 7 +
configure.ac | 5 +
lwip/Makefile| 52 +++
lwip/config.h| 5 +
lwip/iioctl-ops.c| 412 +++
After working on the perl tests fails, I can say they are due to bugs in lwip,
not in our server. I've already sent the bug reports.
The attached patch includes all required changes in previous emails.
Joan Lledó, on dim. 29 oct. 2017 11:46:20 +0100, wrote:
> the perl testsuite indeed found some bugs. So I'll send the new patch
> when I have them fixed.
Heh :)
Thanks!
Samuel
2017-10-22 17:25 GMT+02:00 Samuel Thibault :
>>
>> Unfortunately, lwip doesn't provide a lwip_ppoll() function.
>
> Ah, I saw it in lwipv6, I thought it was generally available.
>
> That being said, it'd be better to make the code already use struct
> timespec, converting to coarser resolution only
Hello,
Joan Lledó, on mer. 18 oct. 2017 09:24:22 +0200, wrote:
> >> +static error_t
> >> +lwip_io_select_common (struct sock_user *user,
> >> +mach_port_t reply,
> >> +mach_msg_type_name_t reply_type,
> >> +struct timeval *tv, int *select
Joan Lledó, on mer. 18 oct. 2017 09:24:22 +0200, wrote:
> > Last but not least, did you try to run the glibc testsuite while running
> > this TCP/IP stack? It would probably find potential bugs. Also, the
> > perl testsuite is probably a nice thing to run.
>
> I need help here. I've been googlin
Hello Samuel,
Thanks for taking your time reviewing my code.
2017-09-27 0:44 GMT+02:00 Samuel Thibault :
>> +error_t
>> +lwip_S_io_write (struct sock_user * user,
>> + char *data,
>> + size_t datalen,
>> + off_t offset, mach_msg_type_number_t * amount)
>> +{
Samuel Thibault, on mer. 27 sept. 2017 00:44:15 +0200, wrote:
> Last but not least, did you try to run the glibc testsuite while running
> this TCP/IP stack? It would probably find potential bugs. Also, the
> perl testsuite is probably a nice thing to run.
(I'm not saying I won't commit this wor
Hello,
Joan Lledó, on mer. 06 sept. 2017 10:09:36 +0200, wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lwip/iioctl-ops.c
> +/* Get the interface from its name */
> +static struct netif *
> +get_if (char *name)
...
> +
> + netif = netif_list;
> + while (netif != 0)
> +{
> + if (strcmp (netif_get_state
---
Makefile | 4 +
config.make.in | 7 +
configure.ac | 5 +
lwip/Makefile| 51 +++
lwip/config.h| 5 +
lwip/iioctl-ops.c| 418 +++
This patch includes some refactoring in the device modules to remove
borrowed code from lwip.
From: Joan Lledó
---
Makefile | 4 +
config.make.in | 7 +
configure.ac | 5 +
lwip/Makefile| 51 +++
lwip/config.h| 5 +
lwip/iioctl-ops.c| 418
This patch incorporates Justus changes in the lwip Makefile
>> # Whether we found libgcrypt.
>> HAVE_LIBGCRYPT = @HAVE_LIBGCRYPT@
>>
>> +# Whether we found libgcrypt.
>
> Copy-paste error :)
>
Ops!, yes... you've got a sharp eye!
Hi Joan,
On 24 Aug 2017, at 18:49, Joan Lledó wrote:
> ...
> diff --git a/config.make.in b/config.make.in
> index dfbf0c1..f74220e 100644
> --- a/config.make.in
> +++ b/config.make.in
> @@ -99,6 +99,13 @@ HAVE_SUN_RPC = @HAVE_SUN_RPC@
> # Whether we found libgcrypt.
> HAVE_LIBGCRYPT = @HAVE_LIBGC
---
Makefile | 4 +
config.make.in | 7 +
configure.ac | 5 +
lwip/Makefile| 51 +++
lwip/config.h| 5 +
lwip/iioctl-ops.c| 418 +++
I made some changes to conditionally build the lwip translator depending on
whether liblwip is installed.
---
Makefile | 1 +
lwip/Makefile| 51 +++
lwip/config.h| 5 +
lwip/iioctl-ops.c| 418
lwip/io-ops.c| 560 ++
lwip/lwip-hurd.h
Hello,
This is the LwIP translator I wrote during my GSoC. The translator uses LwIP
as a regular library and therefore the stack sources are not included in the
patch.
The lwip external libary may be downloaded from [1] or cloned from [2].
Regards,
Joan
--
[1] http://da
36 matches
Mail list logo
