Etienne Brateau, le sam. 24 sept. 2022 18:31:45 +0200, a ecrit:
> When we want to enable APIC, we must initialize the structure or
> otherwise, it will try to access to a not initialized memory addresses.
Applied, thanks!
> ---
> i386/i386/smp.c | 10 ++
> i386/i386at/model_dep.c
Ok, I understand. I agree with split apic_init and smp init. But I prefer
that the apic init calls be in a separated function, instead directly in
machine_init()
El sáb, 24 sept 2022 a las 20:14, Etienne Brateau (<
etienne.brat...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> APIC is also useful for MSI/MSI-X (for PCI
APIC is also useful for MSI/MSI-X (for PCI). So you might want to have APIC
without SMP.
Le sam. 24 sept. 2022 à 19:39, Almudena Garcia
a écrit :
> At first question: why do you want to enable APIC without SMP.
> In my known, APIC is only useful when there are multiple processors. Even
> IOAPIC
At first question: why do you want to enable APIC without SMP.
In my known, APIC is only useful when there are multiple processors. Even
IOAPIC has the purpose of distribute IO inputs to multiple processors.
+++ b/i386/i386at/model_dep.c
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
When we want to enable APIC, we must initialize the structure or
otherwise, it will try to access to a not initialized memory addresses.
---
i386/i386/smp.c | 10 ++
i386/i386at/model_dep.c | 10 --
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/i386/i386/
