Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2006-03-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 01:29:31PM -0500, I wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:49:50AM +0200, I wrote: > > [...] > > The ChangeLog in a condensed form: > > #v+ > > 2005-09-01 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > * boot/boot.c (boot_script_exec_cmd): Fix invalid lvalues. > > * lib

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2006-02-05 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Are there any objections that can convince me not to commit those to the Hurd's trunk? Other than you not having any permissions as far as I can see? ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2006-02-04 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:49:50AM +0200, I wrote: > [...] > The ChangeLog in a condensed form: > #v+ > 2005-09-01 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * boot/boot.c (boot_script_exec_cmd): Fix invalid lvalues. > * libdiskfs/priv.h: Include . > * nfsd/loop.c (server_loop): F

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-10-30 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
I commited the following to ams-branch: boot/ChangeLog 2005-09-01 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * boot.c (boot_script_exec_cmd): Fix invalid lvalues. nfsd/ChangeLog 2005-09-01 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * loop.c (server_loop): Fix invalid lvalues. pfinet/Chan

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:13:05AM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: >`hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.fixes.patch' > > Could you resend the patch in whole with whatever fixes? Here we go: boot/ChangeLog 2005-09-01 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * boot.c (boot_script_exec_cmd): Fix invalid lv

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-15 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:51:26AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > The system stayed usable after installing the files, running > > /hurd/ext2fs by hand didn't raise a segmentation fault. > > OK, thanks. I didn't invest much time in gcc 4.0 then but just switched > to 3.3

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-14 Thread Neal H. Walfield
> It seems to be caused by _pthread_self, which is defined in > libpthread/sysdeps/mach/hurd/pt-sysdep.h. __hurd_threadvar_location is > defined in glibc's include/hurd/threadvar.h, which is included by > pt-sysdep.h. > > I "fixed" that issue by rebuilding parts of the Hurd with optimizations. >

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-14 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Don't build the Hurd without optimisation, some of the switches that get set when compiling with optimisation are needed. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 09:51:48AM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > The system stayed usable after installing the files, running > > /hurd/ext2fs by hand didn't raise a segmentation fault. > > OK, thanks. I didn't invest much time in gcc 4.0 then but just switched > to 3.3

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-12 Thread Neal H. Walfield
At Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:25:18 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:49:50AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > Hi! > > > > The attached `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.patch' makes the Hurd buildable with > > gcc-4.0. > > A fix (to be applied after the above patch) is attached: > `hurd_v.

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-11 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Have you tried to boot with such compiled Hurd? I've compiled ext2fs with gcc 4.0 some weeks ago and ext2fs always raised something like SEGV even when just run from command line. Always always always send a backtrace of a segfault! :-) (maybe crash could be frobed into dumping a backtr

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-11 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Has anyone done any further testing on this set of patches? ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-11 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
A fix (to be applied after the above patch) is attached: `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.fixes.patch' The patch only fixes my previous patch, so no new ChangeLog entry is needed. Could you resend the patch in whole with whatever fixes? ___ Bug-hurd mailing

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-07 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Thomas Schwinge wrote: > The system stayed usable after installing the files, running > /hurd/ext2fs by hand didn't raise a segmentation fault. OK, thanks. I didn't invest much time in gcc 4.0 then but just switched to 3.3 :-) And the only change I've made was something about argp - I was only i

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-06 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 07:29:33PM +0300, Ognyan Kulev wrote: > Thomas Schwinge wrote: > >The attached `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.patch' makes the Hurd buildable with > >gcc-4.0. > > Have you tried to boot with such compiled Hurd? I finally got around to do that (after ext2fs had eaten my file system and

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-05 Thread Ognyan Kulev
Thomas Schwinge wrote: The attached `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.patch' makes the Hurd buildable with gcc-4.0. Have you tried to boot with such compiled Hurd? I've compiled ext2fs with gcc 4.0 some weeks ago and ext2fs always raised something like SEGV even when just run from command line. Regards,

Re: [PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-02 Thread Thomas Schwinge
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 12:49:50AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hi! > > The attached `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.patch' makes the Hurd buildable with > gcc-4.0. A fix (to be applied after the above patch) is attached: `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.fixes.patch' The patch only fixes my previous patch, so no new Cha

[PATCH] Building the Hurd with gcc-4.0

2005-09-01 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! The attached `hurd_v.s._gcc-4.0.patch' makes the Hurd buildable with gcc-4.0. The ChangeLog in a condensed form: #v+ 2005-09-01 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * boot/boot.c (boot_script_exec_cmd): Fix invalid lvalues. * libdiskfs/priv.h: Include . * nfsd/loop.c