On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 10:17:48PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> For now, I've just done the minimal change that ought to work. I am not
> set up to check code in to subversions right now (no kerberos where I am).
> Someone who can should check this change in to the oskit-branch of gnumach.
Don
> Shouldn't this be Changelog.oskit? (along with the last entry?)
Yeah, they should be in there. ChangeLog should match the gnumach version
so that if the oskit-branch gets merged into gnumach at some point, all the
ChangeLog.oskit entries will go at the front of the ChangeLog in the merged
vers
Shouldn't this be Changelog.oskit? (along with the last entry?)
-Neal
> Index: ChangeLog
> ===
> RCS file: /cvs/gnumach/ChangeLog,v
> retrieving revision 1.69.2.2
> diff -b -u -r1.69.2.2 ChangeLog
> --- ChangeLog 2000/03/21 02:47:43
>[T]he bit must not be enabled before paging
> is enabled via CR0.PG. Program correctness may be affected by reversing this
> sequence, and processor performance will be impacted.
Ok, we should move the setting of the bit.
> The other, cleaner, option that I see
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 02:49:55PM -0400, Roland McGrath wrote:
> I'm pretty sure I already make exactly that check (using the oskit header
> files and functions). That is the official Intel way of checking for the
> feature. The problem people are reporting is with AMD K6 family
> processors, w
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 07:30:14PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Igor!
>
> On Tue, 05 Sep 2000, Igor Khavkine wrote:
>
> > The first problem was that my computer generated a general protection fault
> > in the i386/intel/pmap.c::pmap_boostrap() function where the code was trying
> > to modify
