Re: [PATCH] Check for rendezvous port death in auth server

On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 10:36 PM, wrote: > This patch no longer applies cleanly. I'll have another look at it tomorrow > but I fear I have lost my grip on the details so I'm not sure I can fix it up > with any confidence. It was straight-forward after all so I committed! Regards, Fredrik

Re: [PATCH] Check for rendezvous port death in auth server

On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 01 Jun 2010 19:53:08 +0200, a écrit : >> * auth/auth.c (S_auth_user_authenticate,S_auth_server_authenticate): >> Return EINVAL if rendezvous port dies during transaction. >> >> Shall I commit? > > It looks good to

Re: [PATCH] Check for null ports in auth server

On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Thu 03 Jun 2010 19:09:55 +0200, a écrit : >> * auth/auth.c (S_auth_user_authenticate, S_auth_server_authenticate): >> Fail with EINVAL if RENDEZVOUS is MACH_PORT_NULL. >> >> Shall I commit? > > ditto. > > Samuel Done

Re: [PATCH] Apply pattern-matching immediately beneath the stow directory.

Hi, On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Carl Fredrik Hammar wrote: >> Do you have some general idea of how multi-component pattern matching >> could be implemented more efficiently than that?  Some vague pointer >> should suffice for me to adapt the idea to unionfs. > > How about matching one componen