> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
>> arnuld uttre writes:
>The hardware has gone beyond any imagination of virtually any
>XIX century's person, but the English language that we're
>currently using is still pretty mu
of why it is stopped.
I have these questions:
(1) What do you guys think of this ? agreement, disagreement, hate
this crazy idea, ? or look at this guy named arnuld, he is completely
insane, thinking of rewriting 20 years of work into some new language
in next 2 years.
(2) is there any
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> It has been my plan for a long time, but needed to much work effort to be
> done immediatelly. So I postponed it. Has now perhaps the time come to
> revisit this topic, in context of just having lost http (port 80)
into the direction that does not lead to the place
where we are trying to reach from last 23 years. we need to change.
just analyse the HURD histrory & thought over what i said for some
time.
thanks
-- arnuld
http://arnuld.blogspot.com/
--
arnuld
e
have never gone, our own microkernel.
still, i see Neal,Marcus,Shapiro & a few others whose name i usually
forgot (sorry for that) carry expertise. i am open to thoughts.
-- arnuld
http://arnuld.blogspot.com/
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
n contribute to the development of
GNU/HURD OS on L4 microkernel. I am just learning but
in the coming months I will develop myself and will
learn PERL, LISP and 'C' too( as told by Eric S.
Raymond in "How to become a Hacker"). Tell me how can
I contribute, if my skills
