Joseph S. Myers dixit:
>It's desirable to be able to configure GCC correctly in the presence of
>installed headers and only a dummy libc.so, so as to get a GCC that can be
>used to build the full glibc.
Ah, right, the GNU case. Sorry, I totally did not have that one in mind,
even though I know
Thomas Schwinge dixit:
>Ideally, IMO, this test (for stack-smashing-protection support in glibc)
>should not be done by grepping through SYSROOT's features.h, but instead
>by using the CPP for doing that.
Why not just autoconf?
Check for the presence of __stack_smash_handler() in libc… or am I m
Thomas Schwinge dixit:
>First, the check for gcc_cv_libc_provides_ssp is not complete, as has
>already pointed out (with patches!) before, but is still not fixed on
>trunk. Let me revisit that: in configure.ac it is being checked for
>``case "$target" in *-*-linux*)'' which should rather match ``
