Re: Stability of Hurd systems

* Thomas Schwinge wrote on Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 01:40:38PM CEST: > So, to sum it up: just do your work, and if you notice strange things > then please report them. OK, thanks for the explanation. The Libtool testsuite has been known to knock out a few odd buggy systems, so I'll be on the watch th

Re: Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl, --version-script

[ Libtoolers, this is ] * Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:43:36AM CET: > Michael Banck, le Mon 22 Jan 2007 22:38:49 +0100, a écrit : > > Hopefully somebody can check that on CVS HEAD, do you expect big problems? [ ...make check and ] > make check-l

Re: Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl, --version-script

Hello Samuel, Thanks for all your testing efforts, very helpful. * Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:43:36AM CET: > Michael Banck, le Mon 22 Jan 2007 22:38:49 +0100, a écrit : > > Hopefully somebody can check that on CVS HEAD, do you expect big problems? > > make check-local got a

Re: Bug#407079: libtool: All GNU targets support -Wl, --version-script

* Samuel Thibault wrote on Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:10:43AM CET: > Ralf Wildenhues, le Tue 16 Jan 2007 09:18:18 +0100, a écrit : > > > > What would gnu* be good for? > > For hurd-i386. What's the complete host string (or possible strings) for Hurd? I'm asking

typos in gnumach manual

Hello there, here's a bunch of typo fixes for the gnumach manual. (You didn't mean "netword", right?) Cheers, Ralf 2007-01-20 Ralf Wildenhues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * doc/mach.texi: Fix some ty

Re: Hurd source tree; inter-directory dependencies

Hi Bas, * Bas Wijnen wrote on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 09:58:47AM CEST: > > In one of my projects, I use the nonrecursive approach, but I still have a > Makefile.am per directory. Yes, it's a good idea to group things this way (by using included Makefile.am snippets) > Automake obviously isn't buil

Re: Hurd source tree; inter-directory dependencies

Hi Thomas, * Thomas Schwinge wrote on Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 11:42:28AM CEST: > > In the old build system we had the very conventient feature that you > could `make progb' from the top level build directory and it would > automagically first build the libraries `progb' depends on (as specified > by