Re: Fwd: [Introspector-developers] status report

2003-10-17 Thread PUYDT Julien
On ven, 2003-10-17 at 15:03, James Michael DuPont wrote: > Well, I might do that some time. RIght now I am happy to be able to > compile without rebooting and installing all this stuff. You can give the hurd a try without rebooting with bochs. Snark on freenode ___

Re: ruby 1.8

2003-08-17 Thread PUYDT Julien
Le dim 17/08/2003 à 22:34, Manfred Hansen a écrit : > Only installed the packages and run a "Hello World" ruby program. > I didn't know about a test stage. Oh, I don't know either, but some package do some sanity checking after compilation, so I was asking. > I can only say, that i didn't change

Re: ruby 1.8

2003-08-17 Thread PUYDT Julien
Le dim 17/08/2003 à 16:36, Manfred Hansen a écrit : > i have build the packages for ruby 1.8. Just built or also tested? Perhaps there is a test stage to the building? JP PS: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? not [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMA

Bug#190732: Bug List

2003-08-03 Thread PUYDT Julien
Le sam 02/08/2003 à 15:40, Barry deFreese a écrit : > Marco, > > Here is the bug/patch list that I put together. Any input is welcome. > > Thanks!! About the hello.c patch I proposed: I will remake it for the following reasons: * Jeroen Dekkers gave feedback on the code, that will get used; * A

Re: [PATCH (long)] hello.c follow-up

2003-07-28 Thread PUYDT Julien
Le lun 28/07/2003 à 14:26, Jeroen Dekkers a écrit : > > Notice that in storeio, trivfs_S_io_seek uses open_seek, which doesn't > > check the offset sanity either; I'll take a look at it when I'll have > > understood things a little more. > > There are more places where this check doesn't exist.

Re: [PATCH (long)] hello.c follow-up

2003-07-20 Thread PUYDT Julien
Le dim 20/07/2003 à 16:49, Alfred M. Szmidt a écrit : > This ChangeLog is just bogus. Please read the GNU Coding Standard on > how to format, and write the entries (hint: Emacs' C-x 4 a > (add-change-log-entry-other-window) binding is very nice!) I don't see how this ChangeLog entry is bogus, in

[PATCH (long)] hello.c follow-up

2003-07-18 Thread PUYDT Julien
Hi, this long patch is supposed to make hello.c correct and "robust"... it includes the previously posted patch. Notice that in storeio, trivfs_S_io_seek uses open_seek, which doesn't check the offset sanity either; I'll take a look at it when I'll have understood things a little more. Here is a

Re: [PATCH] $(HURD)/trans/hello.c compilation

2003-07-16 Thread PUYDT Julien
Le mer 16/07/2003 à 17:51, Alfred M. Szmidt a écrit : > You forgot a ChangeLog entry Here's one: 2003-07-16 Julien PUYDT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * hello.c (trivfs_modify_stat, trivfs_S_io_seek): make it compliant with the new declarations in trivfs*.h. Snark on #hurd, #hurdfr _

[PATCH] $(HURD)/trans/hello.c compilation

2003-07-16 Thread PUYDT Julien
Hi, I recently got some time to have a look at the hurd. I found some of the interfaces have changed a little. I made a patch, to be able to compile hello.c again (note: this only makes it compile, it doesn't make it good; for example the seek function doesn't do any check). Perhaps I'll have a l