> As I understand ORBit is going to have DII, DSI in near feature.
> And I think that DII and DSI supposed to be in ORB. Correct me
> if I'm wrong.
No, you are right. DII and DSI and part of the standard. They are just
not very useful, except for very specialized applications. Instead of
the DII
> I just want to start with most conformant ORB. I suppose CORBA
> developers may need these parts.
A check-box point of view may not give you a correct answer to the
question "what ORB is most conformant". You'd also had to consider
correctness of the implementation. Also, there are other typica
> I know that ORBit is used in GNOME, but according this page
> - http://www.vex.net/~ben/corba/orbmatrix.html
> ORBit lacks DII, DSI, IFR, BOA. Probably information on page is out of
> date.
That is all still correct. However, instead of the BOA, ORBit supports
the POA. Why do you need the DII,
> I know this. It just has lack of basic CORBA services yet. I'm sure
> it will go well and have them latter, but now MICO/OmniORB2 support
> CORBA standard better.
Out of curiosity: Which of the "basic CORBA services" do you need that
are still missing, and what do you need them for?
> And seco
> Only one GPL ORB with C mapping is ORBit, which is still on early
> development stage.
I think both parts of that statement are incorrect. ORBit is not in
early development; instead, it is a mature implementation which has
been extensively tested as part of the Gnome project.
Furthermore, ther
