--- Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 03:13:59AM -0700, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > > Yes, it is very consistent and abstract. But, it is also
> incredible
> > > slow
> > > and resource heavy, and enforces a lot of
--- Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 01:52:14PM -0700, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > > I was a bit surprised at your assertions about Mach and Hurd,
> too.
> >
> > I think that mach has a very interesting and clean ap
--- Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 06:03:58AM -0700, James Michael DuPont wrote:
> > > No it doesn't.
> > > No it isn't.
> >
> > Looks like you have been watching too much Monty Python :
> [...]
> >
on :
http://jokes4u.port5.com/montypython/ArgumentSkit.html
"" PUNTER It isn't. Argument's an intellectual process - contradiction
is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says.
BENNETT No it isn't.
PUNTER Yes it IS!
BENNETT Not at all.""
Dear all, you might find this of relevance,
soon we will be able to connnect the semantic information of the MiG
interfaces to the information extracted from the gcc.
mike
--- James Michael DuPont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From James Michael DuPont Thu Oct 16 01:28:05 2003
>
