Let your computer be the best.

2005-05-23 Thread Erik
Update your computer now. http://BWtjXZmrkfj8nf48323u10k4j.colagicola5.com/?pcyideypwteijs Erik ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: OSKit-Mach problem

2001-05-14 Thread Erik Verbruggen
xec -loskit_unsupp -loskit_dev -loskit_linux_dev -loskit_diskpart -Wl,-\) -lgcc gcc -O oskit-kernel-ide.o -o oskit-kernel-ide /usr/i386-gnu/bin/ld: cannot open crti.o: No such file or directory collect2: ld returned 1 exit status And here I get stuck... Erik. ___

Re: [RFC] hurd/hurd_types.defs

2001-05-01 Thread Erik Verbruggen
idths, and not merely > local machine things. Um, well, we might want to update this. Or something. Or just drop the network part. Just out of curiosity: Mach did work on Alpha, no? How did they do this 32/64 bit stuff there? Erik. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: Interaction of pthreads and cthreads

2001-05-01 Thread Erik Verbruggen
m is used in an actual application. The problem with the patch of Igor (IIRC) is that it does need some clean-up. Also, the pthread stuff can't be seperated from glibc, as it uses some hooks to do at-startup and at-fork initialization. I'm building glibc now, but that's not going as f

Re: Hurd SMP (lack of) progress report.

2001-04-26 Thread Erik Verbruggen
t occurs. The problem here is a) to prevent any scheduling during interrupt handling (does rescheduling only occur on timer-interrupt?) and b) how the interrupt thread tells the kernel "I'm done, do an sti() and make me sleep". So could someone who ha

Re: [PATCH] Operating system independence; Hurd Port.

2001-03-29 Thread Erik Verbruggen
e is too long to type in...) > > I disagree. It isn't a port to an operating system, it is a port to > a kernel. > > The name of the kernels are Hurd and Linux. Not Hurd, but GNUMach then. Hurd is just a bunch of user-space servers which do no device stuff. Erik. __

pthreads in hurd

2001-02-28 Thread Erik Verbruggen
ich in features than cthreads. Erik. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: stopping of translators

2000-10-10 Thread Erik Verbruggen
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 07:48:15AM +0530, Pankaj Kaushal wrote: > Erik Verbruggen wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > A short question: when do translators actually quit? > well a translator with -c will stay across reboots > and -a will not stand reboots > &g

stopping of translators

2000-10-09 Thread Erik Verbruggen
Hello, A short question: when do translators actually quit? When you do a "ls -alni /dev" a translator for every device in /dev is started and are only stopped by a TERM signal, or a reboot. Some of them will never be used actually used to do "real"

Hurd and /dev listing

2000-09-27 Thread Erik Verbruggen
v dir Could it be that the translators do not expect to receive a message when they are already used? Erik. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: Hurd and /dev listing

2000-09-27 Thread Erik Verbruggen
On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 08:58:19PM +0200, Erik Verbruggen wrote: > Hi, > > A good way to slow down Hurd, and make X hang, is to run this small > shell script: Stupid me, forgot to mention that this is the 2000921 buildfrom Marcus. And one more observation: the slowing down cou