k about is things like
streaming video broadcast over long distances whereas parallel/distributed
people would like something that would give them a very efficient way to do a
broadcast/scatter/gather/reduce etc.
Thanks,
- --
Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Comp. Sci. Dept., Bilkent
Jeff Bailey wrote:
>
> I got 3 copies of it, so I assumed it was spam and deleted it.
>
Translates to 'you can end your sexual problems', sth like that. In TR,
there's a whole lot of spam. Very annoying.
--
Eray Ozkural (exa) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Comp. Sci. Dep
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 03:14:43PM +0100, Johan Rydberg wrote:
> "Eray Ozkural (exa)" wrote:
> Don't you mean Berkeley? Well, here's an URL to the Sprite project at
> Berkeley:
>
> http://www.cs.berkeley.edu:80/projects/sprite/sprite.html
Arrgh. Sure, Berke
Mridul Jain wrote:
> > Anyway, those
> > people have been there'n' done that, and AFAIK they
> > aren't trying to
> > facilitate a multi-language development for their
> > modular
> > kernels, why not?
>
> Come on let's not bring in Billy here.Ok you can be
> happy coding in VB thro'out.
>
Bill
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> I think it is single server, not multi server. There are many single server
> systems, and they share the same deficiencies as monolithical kernels.
> The linux kernel is also "modular", the term is not clear and as thus it is
> confusing to use it.
Let me just confes
Ognyan Kulev wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 04:15:16PM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 10, 2001 at 03:12:46PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
> > > One beautiful solution will be batching many IPC requests in one context
> > > switch, e.g. (open,read,cl
Mridul Jain wrote:
>
> Hey things are cool!!It's just a useful discussion.:-)
>
All right :)
> > So, you're saying that a well optimized ORB can be
> > just as good as MIG.
> > That raises two other questions:
> > 1) Is CORBA going to be as slow as MIG?
> > 2) Is MIG slow enough?
>
> I th
hi,
Igor Khavkine wrote:
>
> CORBA is only a source level standard. It is not restricted to IIOP
> or any other message passing protocol, the so to say "backend"
> can be changed according to need. For example regular IPC on the same
> machine can be done through the Mach message passing facilit
Mridul Jain wrote:
>
> hi,
> As I was preparing to work on the topic - Corba
> replacement for MIG ;
Make sure it doesn't turn out to yield a Java level performance. ;)
That standard called Corba was not tailored for microkernel
message passing.
I can notice the messages as they are being sent
