Applied, thanks!
Etienne Brateau, le mar. 19 nov. 2024 20:10:48 +0100, a ecrit:
> ---
> configfrag-first.ac | 11 +++
> configfrag.ac | 11 ---
> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/configfrag-first.ac b/configfrag-first.ac
> index 5dc0db2c..
---
configfrag-first.ac | 11 +++
configfrag.ac | 11 ---
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configfrag-first.ac b/configfrag-first.ac
index 5dc0db2c..22e34af8 100644
--- a/configfrag-first.ac
+++ b/configfrag-first.ac
@@ -23,6 +23,17 @@ nlpr=0
Sergey Bugaev, le mar. 19 nov. 2024 13:21:47 +0300, a ecrit:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:08 PM Samuel Thibault
> wrote:
> > Ah, yes. Since it's not a performance-critical service, you can as well
> > use ports_manage_port_operations_one_thread instead, and get done with
> > it :)
>
> This might
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 12:08 PM Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Ah, yes. Since it's not a performance-critical service, you can as well
> use ports_manage_port_operations_one_thread instead, and get done with
> it :)
This might be an issue once we implement the blocking read/select
functionality; don't
On 11/19/24 5:08 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Zhaoming Luo, le mar. 19 nov. 2024 16:54:38 +0800, a ecrit:
On 11/17/24 9:04 PM, Sergey Bugaev wrote:
I don't think I need to do anything before exit. However, maybe I need to
ensure the rtc operations is thread-safe; I haven't done it.
Ah, yes. Sinc
Zhaoming Luo, le mar. 19 nov. 2024 16:54:38 +0800, a ecrit:
> On 11/17/24 9:04 PM, Sergey Bugaev wrote:
> I don't think I need to do anything before exit. However, maybe I need to
> ensure the rtc operations is thread-safe; I haven't done it.
Ah, yes. Since it's not a performance-critical service,
First of all, thanks for the code review.
On 11/17/24 9:04 PM, Sergey Bugaev wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 3:34 PM Zhaoming Luo wrote:
diff --git a/hurd/rtc.h b/hurd/rtc.h
new file mode 100644
index ..6516e86c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hurd/rtc.h
+struct rtc_time {
+ int tm_sec;
+ int
