Re: 64bit startup

2023-06-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergey Bugaev, le mar. 06 juin 2023 23:22:53 +0300, a ecrit: > For one thing you seem to have rebuilt/updated the packages, but not > the rootfs image, so now the debuginfo I download doesn't match the > binaries in the image. Please update the image too! Oh, right, sorry! Now done so. Samuel

Re: 64bit startup

2023-06-06 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023, 23:56 Luca wrote: > yes this makes perfectly sense, I think I'm chasing the same bug currently, > or some variation of it. With some tracing I saw that this corruption seems > to happen when an irq (usually timer) fires when returning from a trap, > although not necessarily

Re: 64bit startup

2023-06-06 Thread Luca
Il 6 giugno 2023 20:22:53 UTC, Sergey Bugaev ha scritto: >On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 3:03 PM Sergey Bugaev wrote: >> That is going to be much easier to debug than debootstrap, thank you! > >Unfortunately I'm facing some troubles :| > >For one thing you seem to have rebuilt/updated the packages, but n

Re: 64bit startup

2023-06-06 Thread Sergey Bugaev
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 3:03 PM Sergey Bugaev wrote: > That is going to be much easier to debug than debootstrap, thank you! Unfortunately I'm facing some troubles :| For one thing you seem to have rebuilt/updated the packages, but not the rootfs image, so now the debuginfo I download doesn't mat

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Use O_IGNORE_CTTY where appropriate

2023-06-06 Thread Sergey Bugaev
Hello, On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 11:58 PM Paul Eggert wrote: > > On 2023-06-04 13:42, Sergey Bugaev via Libc-alpha wrote: > > - int flags = O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK | O_DIRECTORY | O_CLOEXEC; > > + int flags = O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK | O_DIRECTORY | O_CLOEXEC | > > O_IGNORE_CTTY; > > Why is O_IGNORE_C