Re: Apparent deadlock in processes interacting with /hurd/fifo

Hi, Samuel Thibault skribis: > Ludovic Courtès, le ven. 25 nov. 2022 12:35:58 +0100, a ecrit: >> Let’s assume you do this: >> >> mkfifo fifo >> rpctrace cat fifo >> >> I think there’s at least one bug here: ‘dir_lookup’ should complete >> immediately; it’s ‘io_read’ that should block. > >

Re: coreutils-8.32 test failure on i586-gnu

Hi, Samuel Thibault skribis: > It seems that replying on the web interface didn't work, so replying > again here by mail. Weird. > Ludovic Courtès, le mer. 26 oct. 2022 19:20:07 +0200, a ecrit: >> ludo@childhurd ~$ mkfifo fifo >> ludo@childhurd ~$ ls -l fifo >> prw-r--r-- 1 ludo users 0 Oct 21

Re: coreutils-8.32 test failure on i586-gnu

Hello, It seems that replying on the web interface didn't work, so replying again here by mail. Ludovic Courtès, le mer. 26 oct. 2022 19:20:07 +0200, a ecrit: > ludo@childhurd ~$ mkfifo fifo > ludo@childhurd ~$ ls -l fifo > prw-r--r-- 1 ludo users 0 Oct 21 07:08 fifo > ludo@childhurd ~$ df ./fifo

Re: Apparent deadlock in processes interacting with /hurd/fifo

Ludovic Courtès, le ven. 25 nov. 2022 12:35:58 +0100, a ecrit: > Let’s assume you do this: > > mkfifo fifo > rpctrace cat fifo > > I think there’s at least one bug here: ‘dir_lookup’ should complete > immediately; it’s ‘io_read’ that should block. ? No. Open Group says about open():