Almudena Garcia, le jeu. 13 août 2020 00:35:36 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Users do need that to understand what's happening.
> But, if by any reason, the machine has more than cpu but the detection fails,
> could be interesting to advise about the system being running with an only
> cpu.
> It's not?
Yes
> Applied and fixed a bit, thanks!
Thanks. Now I only have to fix the next patches. We are closer now
> But that will only enter if when api_success != 0, thus when we actually
> have a failure. Compare explicitly against ACPI_SUCCESS
Oops, I forget this. I will fix It.
> Then there is no need
Fair enough. I'll see if I can't try to help you in your project. Fair
warning, I am a little out of my league here. Just writing plain
ordinary C programs with pointers to strucks and memory management is
hard for me.
--
Joshua Branson
Sent from Emacs and Gnus
Almudena Garcia, le mar. 11 août 2020 02:17:35 +0200, a ecrit:
> > What for?
> > num_cpus is something that you make returned by a smp_get_numcpus()
> > function, so it's not actually useful to also expose it in a struct.
> > What else would go into that structure?
> By example, the master cpu (BSP
Almudena Garcia, le mer. 12 août 2020 16:03:06 +0200, a ecrit:
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] smp: Add pseudoclass to manage APIC operations
Applied, thanks!
> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] vm_kern: Add kmem_alloc_aligned_table
Applied and fixed a bit, thanks!
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] smp: Add APIC finder and par
I attach a new set of patches, fixing some errors
El mar., 11 ago. 2020 a las 23:44, Almudena Garcia (<
liberamenso10...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> I fixed the problem manually. I expect the patch works fine.
>
> El mar., 11 ago. 2020 a las 23:24, Almudena Garcia (<
> liberamenso10...@gmail.com>) es
