Missatge de Joshua Branson del dia dc., 29
d’ag. 2018 a les 22:57:
> That makes sense. Can we trouble you for a teaser update on the mailing list?
It's OK, buts there's not really too much to say. The translator is
upstream and we created a debian package to install lwip as a user
shared library
Ok. I forgot a little piece of the project: detect CPU in runtime, to avoid set
the number manually before compilation. I speak of this previously, but I
forget to refer It in my latest message.
El Viernes 31 de agosto de 2018, Samuel Thibault escribió:
> Almudena Garcia, le ven. 31 août 2018 1
Thanks!
El vie., 31 ago. 2018 a las 13:44, Samuel Thibault ()
escribió:
> Almudena Garcia, le ven. 31 août 2018 13:28:18 +0200, a ecrit:
> > Yes. Then, I think that the MMU (Memory Management Unit) has a special
> case to
> > multiprocessor in pmap.c. If It's correct, then we don't need to
> impl
Almudena Garcia, le ven. 31 août 2018 13:28:18 +0200, a ecrit:
> Yes. Then, I think that the MMU (Memory Management Unit) has a special case to
> multiprocessor in pmap.c. If It's correct, then we don't need to implement
> multiprocessor support in MMU (may we need to fix any error, of course).
Th
Yes. Then, I think that the MMU (Memory Management Unit) has a special case
to multiprocessor in pmap.c. If It's correct, then we don't need to
implement multiprocessor support in MMU (may we need to fix any error, of
course).
So, to implement SMP, we have to add IPI support in process scheduler a
Ooops!!!, My mailer dropped all ^M again! I can't quilt push the patch.
Please, may you revert or remove the last commit and apply the
attached one? I'm sorry...
Missatge de Samuel Thibault del dia dj., 30
d’ag. 2018 a les 10:49:
>
> Joan Lledó, le jeu. 30 août 2018 10:15:40 +0200, a ecrit:
> > s
