On 27.03.2018 01:42, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:20:04 +0200, wrote:
>> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>>> Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote:
I just saw:
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 00:50 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 23:53:31 +0200, wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 02:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Samuel Thibault, on lun. 19 mars 2018 02:51:22 +0100, wrote:
> > > > - Fixing GNU Coding Style, notably first l
On Tue, 2018-03-27 at 00:49 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:50:58 +0200, wrote
>
> Well, a month is a long time indeed. I guess he needed to move forward,
> so he dropped; no big deal.
Yes it is a big deal. If somebody spends numerous (spare time, unpaid) h
Hello Samuel,
19.03.2018 02:51 Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thanks a lot for the feedback on what needs to be done. It was a busy
> week-end :)
I appreciate your work. :-) Sorry for a kinda off-topic but could you
please visit the Patchwork site [1] and mark your committed patches
as co
Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 23:53:31 +0200, wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 02:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, on lun. 19 mars 2018 02:51:22 +0100, wrote:
> > > - Fixing GNU Coding Style, notably first line of files.
> >
> > Could people have a look in the libpthread
Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:50:58 +0200, wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:42 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:20:04 +0200, wrote:
> > >
> > > What is really wrong is that Matthias Klose removed the Hurd patches.
> >
> > Sure, but see what he w
On Mon, 2018-03-19 at 02:52 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, on lun. 19 mars 2018 02:51:22 +0100, wrote:
> > - Fixing GNU Coding Style, notably first line of files.
>
> Could people have a look in the libpthread repository?
> Most probably, for a lot of these files, one can just ta
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:42 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:20:04 +0200, wrote:
> >
> > What is really wrong is that Matthias Klose removed the Hurd patches.
>
> Sure, but see what he wrote in the changlog: he found the patches
> "unmaintained", i.e. I gues
Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 19:20:04 +0200, wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote:
> > > I just saw:
> > > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision&revision=10084
> > >
> > > This is
On 26 Mar 2018, at 18:20, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote:
>>> I just saw:
>>> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision&revision=10084
>>>
>>> This is really a large step
On Mon, 2018-03-26 at 19:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote:
> > I just saw:
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision&revision=10084
> >
> > This is really a large step BACK:
>
> It's not a step back, it's just fixing so
Svante Signell, on lun. 26 mars 2018 18:50:20 +0200, wrote:
> I just saw:
> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision&revision=10084
>
> This is really a large step BACK:
It's not a step back, it's just fixing something that is completely
wrong.
> Since you could issue that commit t
Hi Samuel,
I just saw:
https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs?view=revision&revision=10084
This is really a large step BACK: Since you could issue that commit to _disable_
gccgo for Hurd, what about committing to _enable_ gccgo for Hurd instead. I just
filed a bug for gcc-8 to build gccgo again
13 matches
Mail list logo