Justus Winter, on lun. 06 mars 2017 20:35:04 +0100, wrote:
> Samuel Thibault writes:
>
> > Agustina Arzille, on lun. 06 mars 2017 15:24:16 -0300, wrote:
> >> On 2017-03-04 19:44, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >> > (thus related with Brent's "multithread rpctrace to avoid deadlocks in
> >> > the kernel
Samuel Thibault writes:
> Agustina Arzille, on lun. 06 mars 2017 15:24:16 -0300, wrote:
>> On 2017-03-04 19:44, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> > (thus related with Brent's "multithread rpctrace to avoid deadlocks in
>> > the kernel" patch)
>>
>> Could be. I'm a bit puzzled as to why rpctrace uses a s
Agustina Arzille, on lun. 06 mars 2017 15:24:16 -0300, wrote:
> On 2017-03-04 19:44, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > (thus related with Brent's "multithread rpctrace to avoid deadlocks in
> > the kernel" patch)
>
> Could be. I'm a bit puzzled as to why rpctrace uses a single thread to trace
> every RPC
Hello, Samuel
On 2017-03-04 18:45, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Do we really want to keep that list sorted? That makes waking up two
times less expensive, but it makes waiting much more expensive, so
overall it's just the same.
And I'd think that in practice, there is more probability that the
thre
