"Brent W. Baccala" writes:
> What is the best way to fork() a child and have a Mach receive right on the
> parent connected to a send right on the child? Or vice versa?
I don't know whether it's the best way, but I did this in
reply-leak.tar.gz posted to https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?48456 :
"Brent W. Baccala" writes:
> What is the best way to fork() a child and have a Mach receive right on the
> parent connected to a send right on the child? Or vice versa?
There is no easy and obvious way that I know. Basically, you need to
insert the send right into the other task, then communica
