Manolis Ragkousis, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 21:31:43 +0300, wrote:
> On 08/20/16 20:47, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Ok, but the Linux part uses glibc 2.22, and you'd rather use it, right?
>
> Of course :-)
Ok, I have pushed it, along the debian glibc 2.22 fixup patches, it
seems to be working fine with
Samuel Thibault, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 22:41:37 +0200, wrote:
> The good news is that there are only half a dozen test regressions.
The even more good news is that these are most probably actually due to
a bogus DNS resolution configuration on my system :)
Samuel
Hello,
Agustina Arzille, on Fri 20 May 2016 00:43:37 -0300, wrote:
> Here are the patches needed to get the ball rolling and finally introduce
> gsync-based synchronization objects into our libc.
Thanks to the coach back home, I got the time to have a look at
integrating this. The good news is t
On 08/20/16 20:47, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Ok, but the Linux part uses glibc 2.22, and you'd rather use it, right?
Of course :-)
Manolis Ragkousis, on Sat 20 Aug 2016 20:42:25 +0300, wrote:
> Actually the Hurd part of Guix uses 2.19 as it is in
> ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/
>
> The glibc tarballs use 2.19 as their version, which is the one I am
> using as the version in our glibc/hurd recipe.
Ok, but the Linux part uses
Hey Samuel,
Actually the Hurd part of Guix uses 2.19 as it is in
ftp://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/hurd/
The glibc tarballs use 2.19 as their version, which is the one I am
using as the version in our glibc/hurd recipe.
Check (gnu packages base) glibc/hurd.
Manolis
On 08/20/16 19:24, Samuel Thibault wro
Hello,
Which glibc version is guix based on? It's very high time we upgrade
our glibc repository, because we see people contribute patch against
it and it makes use rebase the work in downstreams. I'd thus say we
should make our glibc repository based on the minimum version used by
the supported
Hello,
Brent W. Baccala, on Wed 17 Aug 2016 10:58:41 -1000, wrote:
> OK, I seem to have gotten a handle on this thing now.
Cool :)
> First, there's a missing mutex unlock in mach_defpager. I'm attaching two
> patches. One fixes the debug printfs in mach_defpager/default_pager.c, which
> obviou
Svante Signell, on Thu 18 Aug 2016 16:12:38 +0200, wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 14:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, on Wed 17 Aug 2016 18:14:39 +0200, wrote:
> > > On friday, I'll present the latest news of the Hurd.
> >
> > Actually I was asked to do it today, so it's over
