Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks

2016-05-06 Thread Agustina Arzille
Hello, Samuel On 05/06/2016 10:36 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: I ran into a lot of troubles to compile glibc, mostly because the filesystem kept freezing and / or crashing. That's worrying, and surprising to me since buildds keep building stuff for days without too many issues. How are you run

Minor bug introduced by commit b04364b

2016-05-06 Thread Esa Peuha
Most changes in commit b04364b seem to be fine, but this one isn't: @@ -405,7 +401,7 @@ run (const char *server, mach_port_t *ports, task_t *task) } if (verbose) -fprintf (stderr, "started %s\n", prog); +fprintf (stderr, stderr, "started %s\n", prog); /* Dead-name notification

Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks

2016-05-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Agustina Arzille, on Thu 05 May 2016 23:02:35 -0300, wrote: > Here's the first of the patches to replace spin-locks in glibc with locks > based > on gnumach's gsync. Cool :) > I ran into a lot of troubles to compile glibc, mostly because the filesystem > kept freezing and / or crashing.