Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 23:43:58 +0100, wrote: > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2016-02-23 23:27:26) > > Justus Winter, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 23:24:08 +0100, wrote: > > > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2016-02-23 23:04:25) > > > > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 22:22:02 +0100, wrote: > > > > > Thom

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2016-02-23 23:27:26) > Justus Winter, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 23:24:08 +0100, wrote: > > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2016-02-23 23:04:25) > > > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 22:22:02 +0100, wrote: > > > > Thomas Schwinge, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 12:02:36 +0100, wrote: > > > > > >

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 23:24:08 +0100, wrote: > You cannot specify an in-translation without also specifying the > payload version. Though I must admit I don't know how or if that is > enforced. At least libtreefs/fs-mutate.h:#define FILE_INTRAN treefs_handle_t treefs_begin_using_han

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 23:24:08 +0100, wrote: > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2016-02-23 23:04:25) > > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 22:22:02 +0100, wrote: > > > Thomas Schwinge, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 12:02:36 +0100, wrote: > > > > > I couldn't figure out any pattern from looking at the di

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2016-02-23 23:04:25) > Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 22:22:02 +0100, wrote: > > Thomas Schwinge, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 12:02:36 +0100, wrote: > > > > I couldn't figure out any pattern from looking at the diffs between the > > > > respective Hurd packages' sources. > > >

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 22:22:02 +0100, wrote: > Thomas Schwinge, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 12:02:36 +0100, wrote: > > > I couldn't figure out any pattern from looking at the diffs between the > > > respective Hurd packages' sources. > > I've digged a bit, the difference that matters between

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thomas Schwinge, on Tue 23 Feb 2016 12:02:36 +0100, wrote: > > I couldn't figure out any pattern from looking at the diffs between the > > respective Hurd packages' sources. I've digged a bit, the difference that matters between -2 and -3 is about the protected payload optimization. -2 used to dis

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Justus Winter
Hi :) Quoting Thomas Schwinge (2016-02-23 11:37:58) > 68<--72(pid-1)-> 2400 (rpctrace: ../../utils/rpctrace.c:863: > print_contents: Assertion `inp->msgh_bits & 0x8000U' failed. > Aborted > > (Yay, another rpctrace issue.) ;-) Actually, that is not an rpctrace issue. rpctrace is

Re: Not running into expected SIGSEGV

2016-02-23 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Samuel's MTA (labri.fr) told me that it's "not permissible" to attach *.exe* files to emails. I you didn't receive that file, you can also copy it from darnassus:~tschwinge/stack_check1.exe, or ask me to send it "scrambled". On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:37:58 +0100, I wrote: > The attached program