Greetings, and thanks again for your work on this!
Svante Signell writes:
> On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 11:30 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Cc: bug-hurd
>>
>
>> Running your test program at
>> https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2013/07/msg00038.html
>> on a recent kernel gives an even low
Greetings, and thanks for following up on this! Almost forgot about
that old post.
I suppose if this issue is intractable at the kernel level, we could
always emulate brk as we do on windows and macosx. Not knowing where
the fragmentation occurs, its not clear this would get us true dynamic
prob
On Thu, 2015-10-22 at 11:30 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
> Cc: bug-hurd
>
> Running your test program at
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-hurd/2013/07/msg00038.html
> on a recent kernel gives an even lower limit for memory fragmentation.
> 0x7000 fails now, and I used 0x6b00 in th
Hi,
Cc: bug-hurd
On Wed, 2015-10-21 at 10:57 -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
> Greetings, and thanks for your note! Patch will be included in next
> upload.
>
> Do you work on Hurd? There are several FTBFS errors in gcl dependencies
> (maxima,hol88,axiom,acl2) which I have been unable to resolve and
