Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2014-12-28 14:38:56)
> Oh right. Guile 2.0 relies on the availability of a file system to load
> its modules from. I wonder if we could make some sort of an initrd or
> multiboot module that would contain those files?
We could, but we'd rather avoid using an initrd. And
Justus Winter <4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> skribis:
> Quoting Ludovic Courtès (2014-12-27 22:22:34)
>> Did you consider using a statically-linked Guile? This is what we do in
>> the Linux initrd for Guix, and it’s wonderful. :-)
>>
>> If you take that route, we can make it easier to sha
