zeromq3: ssh freeze by running a test program twice (or once and removing the created socket)

Source: zeromq3 Version: 4.0.5+dfsg-2 Severity: Important Tags: patch User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Usertags: hurd Attached are patches for adding GNU/Hurd to the list of supported architectures for zeromq3. I have tried bot the select and poll versions, same result. Libraries needed to run

[PATCH hurd 1/2] libshouldbeinlibc: add assert.h variant that prints backtraces

* libshouldbeinlibc/assert-backtrace.h: New file. * libshouldbeinlibc/Makefile (installhdrs): Add assert-backtrace.h. --- libshouldbeinlibc/Makefile | 4 ++- libshouldbeinlibc/assert-backtrace.h | 68 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

[PATCH hurd 2/2] include: use assert-backtrace.h in refcount.h

* include/refcount.h: Use assert-backtrace.h. --- include/refcount.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/refcount.h b/include/refcount.h index ebde42d..5bb9660 100644 --- a/include/refcount.h +++ b/include/refcount.h @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ #ifndef _HURD_REFCOUNT

backtrace on assertion failure

Hello, for reference, here is the patch. I'm not sure how to properly integrate this. Justus

Re: let's use a fixed number of threads for libpager

Quoting Richard Braun (2014-10-28 17:59:16) > On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:37:43AM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: > > Preliminary testing on my box as well as on darnassus looks promising > > (modulo some pfinet weirdness that Richard is investigating [and imho > > if there is an issue, it should be unr

Re: Release process & rolling new releases

Hello :) Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-10-06 11:30:26) > Thomas Schwinge, le Mon 06 Oct 2014 11:22:50 +0200, a écrit : > > So, anything specific that we should wait for before bundling the next > > release snapshots? > > It'd be nice to include the init->startup series after review. (I'm OK > wit

Re: let's use a fixed number of threads for libpager

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:37:43AM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: > Preliminary testing on my box as well as on darnassus looks promising > (modulo some pfinet weirdness that Richard is investigating [and imho > if there is an issue, it should be unrelated to this change]). We > will keep you posted.

Re: let's use a fixed number of threads for libpager

On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 01:37:43AM +0100, Justus Winter wrote: > Preliminary testing on my box as well as on darnassus looks promising > (modulo some pfinet weirdness that Richard is investigating [and imho > if there is an issue, it should be unrelated to this change]). We > will keep you posted.