Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Hurd design issues

2013-01-07 Thread Adrienne Thompson
... But we must keep in mind that the Hurd also solves some of the important Unix shortcomings. IOW, if Marcus and Neal were to write a critique of GNU/Linux, it may be much harsher than that of GNU/Hurd. ;-) A New Hope!! Adrienne -- Freedom - no pane, all gaiGN! GNU C-Graph - http://ww

Re: [PATCH,eglibc] Re: Questions about patches for hurdselect.c

2013-01-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Svante Signell, le Tue 18 Dec 2012 14:51:59 +0100, a écrit : > On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 23:02 +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 20:58 +0100, Richard Braun wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:12:10AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > > Richards patch "if (!err && got == 0 && f

Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] The Hurd strikes again

2013-01-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! [Moving this discussion to the bug-hurd list; gnu-prog-discuss is BCCed.] On Sat, 5 Jan 2013 17:58:49 +, "luke.leighton" wrote: > On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 5:19 PM, Jason Self wrote: > >> > That’s not completely true: it /is/ usable, runs 80% of the packages in > >> > Debian, has a modern