Re: [PATCH] procfs: another fix for the process file name in stat/status

2012-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pino Toscano, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 18:16:44 +0200, a écrit : > Updated patch attached. Applied, thanks! Samuel

Re: [PATCH] procfs: another fix for the process file name in stat/status

2012-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pino Toscano, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 18:16:44 +0200, a écrit : > Alle lunedì 10 settembre 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > > Pino Toscano, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 17:31:32 +0200, a écrit : > > > Alle domenica 9 settembre 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > > > > Pino Toscano, le Fri 07 Sep 2012 20:02:56

Re: [PATCH] procfs: another fix for the process file name in stat/status

2012-09-10 Thread Pino Toscano
Alle lunedì 10 settembre 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > Pino Toscano, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 17:31:32 +0200, a écrit : > > Alle domenica 9 settembre 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > > > Pino Toscano, le Fri 07 Sep 2012 20:02:56 +0200, a écrit : > > > > +static int args_filename_length (const ch

Re: [PATCH] procfs: another fix for the process file name in stat/status

2012-09-10 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pino Toscano, le Mon 10 Sep 2012 17:31:32 +0200, a écrit : > Alle domenica 9 settembre 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > > Pino Toscano, le Fri 07 Sep 2012 20:02:56 +0200, a écrit : > > > +static int args_filename_length (const char *name) > > > +{ > > > + const char *p = name; > > > + while (*

Re: [PATCH] procfs: another fix for the process file name in stat/status

2012-09-10 Thread Pino Toscano
Alle domenica 9 settembre 2012, Samuel Thibault ha scritto: > Pino Toscano, le Fri 07 Sep 2012 20:02:56 +0200, a écrit : > > +static int args_filename_length (const char *name) > > +{ > > + const char *p = name; > > + while (*p != '\0' && *p != ' ') > > +++p; > > Why not using index(name, '