Hi!
On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 16:17:29 +0200, "Neal H. Walfield"
wrote:
> At Sat, 4 Aug 2012 15:56:01 +0200,
> Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > On Sat, 04 Aug 2012 15:16:22 +0200, "Neal H. Walfield"
> > wrote:
> > > At Sat, 4 Aug 2012 15:02:46 +0200,
> > > Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > > > > * signal/READM
On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 12:20:09PM -0700, Thomas DiModica wrote:
> I was thinking about what Richard Braun said about removing
> hurd_thread_cancel.
> Attached is an exploration into implementing PTHREAD_CANCEL_HURD as a
> cancellation state extension. It compiles, but I haven't tested if the
> r
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:07:23PM -0700, Thomas DiModica wrote:
> I understand now: we want to immediately dequeue ourselves, even if it means
> wasting cycles later by checking to ensure that we were dequeued. The last
> thing we want is to return ETIMEDOUT when another thread has intervened,
> a
