> Samuel Thibault writes:
> Should we keep procfs in a separate repository, or merge it into the
> main hurd repository?
> Generally enough, did we write a guideline somewhere as to what
> should be in the main hurd repository, or should be separate?
Given that Git has support s
Hello,
I have fixed a few remaining bits, tested with success, and pushed it to
master, thanks!
Samuel
Hello,
Should we keep procfs in a separate repository, or merge it into the
main hurd repository?
Generally enough, did we write a guideline somewhere as to what should
be in the main hurd repository, or should be separate?
Samuel
Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Thu 03 Jun 2010 19:09:55 +0200, a écrit :
> * auth/auth.c (S_auth_user_authenticate, S_auth_server_authenticate):
> Fail with EINVAL if RENDEZVOUS is MACH_PORT_NULL.
>
> Shall I commit?
ditto.
Samuel
Carl Fredrik Hammar, le Tue 01 Jun 2010 19:53:08 +0200, a écrit :
> * auth/auth.c (S_auth_user_authenticate,S_auth_server_authenticate):
> Return EINVAL if rendezvous port dies during transaction.
>
> Shall I commit?
It looks good to me.
Samuel
Da Zheng, le Mon 20 Jul 2009 19:44:06 +0800, a écrit :
> The fourth patch is the main one, which fully enable rpctrace to trace
> multitask programs.
I have applied it.
Samuel
Da Zheng, le Thu 26 Aug 2010 22:47:20 -0400, a écrit :
> No, I don't think so. I haven't touched this stuff for really long time. I
> probably don't have the time to do anything about it right now. Hopefully I
> can find time in the future. Sorry about that.
I have applied it with the minor styl
Update of bug #3939 (project hurd):
Status:None => Fixed
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #3:
Fixed in ccbbdf63102a21
Hi!
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:47:20 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Could we get MiG 1.3.2 released at least? There's some pending changes in
> the Debian packaging I'd like to upload before the freeze (on 2012-06-30),
> but I'd rather avoid having to prepare a snapshot from git, but I'll
> likely ha
