Re: [PATCH,HURD] comment out PF_LINK/AF_LINK

2012-06-22 Thread Paul Eggert
On 06/22/2012 11:22 AM, Roland McGrath wrote:> Programs should just use > proper checks for what they use (i.e. an autoconf-style check for 'struct > sockaddr_dl' or the header that defines it), rather than #ifdef AF_*. Although the autoconf style produces more-portable code, it's still nicer if g

Re: [PATCH,HURD] comment out PF_LINK/AF_LINK

2012-06-22 Thread Roland McGrath
We don't support AF_CHAOS or AF_IPX either. Programs should just use proper checks for what they use (i.e. an autoconf-style check for 'struct sockaddr_dl' or the header that defines it), rather than #ifdef AF_*. Thanks, Roland

[PATCH,HURD] comment out PF_LINK/AF_LINK

2012-06-22 Thread Pino Toscano
Hi, Hurd's bits/socket.h currently define PF_LINK & AF_LINK. Although, they are usually associated with sockaddr_dl sockets, which are not implemented on Hurd, causing few build failures because of the assumption that having AF_LINK defined means there are sockaddr_dl available. The attached p

Re: Releasing GNU Mach & MIG?

2012-06-22 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 00:16:51 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 11:52:52 +0200, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) wrote: > > along with MIG 1.4? > > I thought 1.3.2, > . > I'm happy to do

flubber and grubber down; wiki

2012-06-22 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! Two days ago, zenhost (the Xen dom0 hosting flubber, grubber, snubber) rebooted, and now the root file systems of flubber and grubber are sufficiently damaged that they don't boot anymore (hangs after starting the exec server, init would be next). snubber, the machine behind etc. is fine. T