Re: Bug#616290: ISC-Bugs #25979: FTBFS of isc-dhcp for GNU/Hurd

Hello, (dropping Cc debian-devel, it's not worth it) Here is an updated version of the patch, as well as some information about it, I've both attached the patch and commented it below. There is also an additional patch for the embedded bind code. Eventually, there is an empty rfc3442 script for n

[bug #35293] [ext2fs] cat on directory

Update of bug #35293 (project hurd): Status:None => Invalid Open/Closed:Open => Closed Wiki-like text discussion box: => ___

[bug #35293] [ext2fs] cat on directory

Follow-up Comment #5, bug #35293 (project hurd): Well, no, these characters are supposed to be there: what you get is the raw content of the directory in the filesystem. ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #35293] [ext2fs] cat on directory

Update of bug #35293 (project hurd): Wiki-like text discussion box: => ___ Follow-up Comment #4: Anyway there shouldn't be these characters: "@Ô". And should be n after mcsim (Now there is no o

Re: Bug#616290: [Fwd: [ISC-Bugs #25979] What happened to the dhcp patch in ISC-Bugs #24697 (Debian Bug #616290)?]

On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 22:12 -0800, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 02:20:55PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > > So far our (Debian's) communications with dhcpd upstream on this topic > > seem to be lacking in this area. If you like I would be happy to > > review your next submissi

[bug #35293] [ext2fs] cat on directory

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #35293 (project hurd): POSIX only says that EISDIR should be returned when using write access, so implementations are free to implement a read access (and iirc linux used to do it a long time ago). ___ Reply to th

[bug #35293] [ext2fs] cat on directory

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #35293 (project hurd): IIRC it's a feature, not a bug. ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message posté via/par Savannah http:/