Hi!
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 22:31:42 +0200, Pino Toscano
wrote:
> Alle mercoledì 19 ottobre 2011, Thomas Schwinge ha scritto:
> > Just an oversight, or is there a reason to not changing
> > libnetfs/io-pathconf.c and term/users.c, too?
>
> term/users.c already does that, it seems.
Indeed. :-)
>
Pino Toscano, le Wed 19 Oct 2011 22:31:42 +0200, a écrit :
> term/users.c already does that, it seems.
> About libnetfs/io-pathconf.c, I don't have an NF setup, but I guess the
> attached patch should do it (testing welcome!).
Applied, thanks!
Samuel
Hi,
Alle mercoledì 19 ottobre 2011, Thomas Schwinge ha scritto:
> Just an oversight, or is there a reason to not changing
> libnetfs/io-pathconf.c and term/users.c, too?
term/users.c already does that, it seems.
About libnetfs/io-pathconf.c, I don't have an NF setup, but I guess the
attached pat
Hi!
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:09:32 +0200, Pino Toscano
wrote:
> currently, querying (f)pathconf() for _PC_PATH_MAX return -1 and sets
> errno = EINVAL. At least to my reading of pathconf() in POSIX, when a
> variable has no limit pathconf() for it should return -1 and not change
> errno. For ex
Hi!
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:44:40 +0200, Sergio López wrote:
> Clearing MAY_CACHE flag on a pager initiates a memory object
> termination if this one is not referenced anymore. If the object has a
> significant number of dirty pages (i.e. a file recently created was
> unlinked before diskfs period
Hi,
It's Wednesday again -- which means I'm long overdue writing another
meeting announcement/reminder. 19:00 UTC, irc.freenode.net #hurd;
everone invited to join... You know the drill :-)
-antrik-
