Thomas Schmitt, le Tue 13 Sep 2011 12:29:43 +0200, a écrit :
> routine device_transact_native(
Why "native"?
> Page 3 of mig.ps says:
> "For variable length arrays an additional count parameter is generated
> to specify how much of the array is actually being used."
>
> So do i have to feed
What I'm afraid of with such change is that some applications have
gotten used to be able to call write(), lseek(back), write(again at the
same place), lseek(back), etc. and just get one disk write. We'd need
figures with some real-world testcase to be sure we don't hurt usual
workcases.
Samuel
Hi Antrik,
Thanks for the reminder!
Best wishes,
Arne
At Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:12:49 +0200,
Olaf Buddenhagen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I forgot to mention that of course we are meeting as always today
> (Wednesday) at 19:00 UTC, in channel #hurd on irc.freenode.net. Feel
> free to join us, and/or prp
Hi,
I forgot to mention that of course we are meeting as always today
(Wednesday) at 19:00 UTC, in channel #hurd on irc.freenode.net. Feel
free to join us, and/or prpose interesting discussion topics :-)
-antrik-