I forgot to comment on the udeb version: I don't think we want to create
an inetutils-tools udeb package, while we can simply issue settrans
which should be easy and fine enough, since we only handle one
interface, thus my changes.
Samuel
POSIX states that this should fail with EPERM, not EISDIR:
$ mkdir d
$ link d c
This was detected by the gnulib testsuite; I've since updated that
testsuite to tolerate Hurd's current behavior, but it might be worth
updating link(2) to comply with the standard.
--
Eric Blake ebl...@redhat.com
Hello,
Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 20:50:33 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit :
> > > I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and
> > > dhclient-script.hurd.udeb
> >
> > Ok, g
Diego Nieto Cid, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 18:09:24 -0300, a écrit :
> 2011/3/1 Samuel Thibault :
> > Didn't we have working equivalent in our latest dhcp script?
> >
>
> The script I tried wasn't even calling ifconfig succesfully. IIRC, the
> command line arguments weren't accepted.
Ok.
> But as settr
Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 20:50:33 +0100, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit :
> > > I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and
> > > dhclient-script.hurd.udeb
> >
> > Ok, good, ple
2011/3/1 Samuel Thibault :
> Didn't we have working equivalent in our latest dhcp script?
>
The script I tried wasn't even calling ifconfig succesfully. IIRC, the
command line arguments weren't accepted.
But as settrans was called afterwards everything appeared to work fine.
On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 09:03 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit :
> > I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and
> > dhclient-script.hurd.udeb
>
> Ok, good, please post them for review.
Attached below, with debug output by adding se
Svante Signell, le Tue 01 Mar 2011 08:50:39 +0100, a écrit :
> I have now working scripts dhclient-script.hurd and dhclient-script.hurd.udeb
Ok, good, please post them for review.
> Both udeb for Linux and kfreeBSD have strange constructs I've not been
> able to find out about, e.g.
>
> new_mask
