Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hallo! On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:50:35PM -0500, Steve Dickson wrote: > I don't see these errors I use the following commands to build without > any warnings or errors: [...] > What are you going got generate these errors? I've been building on a GNU/Hurd system. It'd be great, of course,

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/14/2010 04:34 PM, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 16:32, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use >> libtirpc instead.] > > No, it is not. > > It is about making the sunrpc code unavailable for new programs but > keep

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Steve Dickson
On 12/14/2010 04:32 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Hallo! > > [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use > libtirpc instead.] > > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:14:23PM -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:26, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >>> To clarify:

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Ulrich Drepper
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 16:32, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use > libtirpc instead.] No, it is not. It is about making the sunrpc code unavailable for new programs but keep it around for binary compatibility.

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hallo! On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 04:34:59PM -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 16:32, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use > > libtirpc instead.] > > No, it is not. > > It is about making the sunrpc code unavailable f

Re: [Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

2010-12-14 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hallo! [Hurd people: this is about removing SUN RPC code from glibc, and use libtirpc instead.] On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:14:23PM -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 11:26, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > To clarify: did you have anything specific in mind?  I don't know why we >